第六届世界华文传媒与华夏文明国际学术研讨会

第六届世界华文传媒与华夏文明国际学术研讨会
2009年8月6日至9日，新加坡
征 文 通 知
（中国大陆）

在全球政治经济交流日益频繁、文化融合愈加迫切的今天，中华文化以其亘古弥新、博大精深的独特魅力，越来越多地获得了来自全世界的关注与期待。然而，全球化、信息化、数字化的变革无疑给中华文化走向世界提供了比以往任何时候都要多的机遇和挑战。在保持中华文化原汁原味的民族性的同时，如何适应全球视野，塑造自身形象，如何让全世界更加清晰地认识中华文化，更加透彻地理解中华文化，更加包容地接纳中华文化，一直以来，是令海内外传播学者殚精竭虑的一个重要课题。
作为海内外传播学者探讨这一课题的重要平台，由新加坡南洋理工大学黄金辉传播与信息学院、中国新闻史学会和中国华中科技大学传播与信息学院联合主办的“世界华文传媒与华夏文明国际学术研讨会”，将于2009年8月6日 至9日在新加坡举行第六届会议。本次大会秉承“立足全球视域，传播中华文化”的宗旨，诚邀海内外传播学届名家和传播业界精英，共同探讨全球化背景下中华文化传播的现状与发展。

一、会议主题
本次会议的主题为“中华文化传播：从中国走向世界”，可从历史、现代和未来的不同角度探讨。与此同时，围绕该主题，并结合相关领域，会议拟展开对以下（但不限于）具体课题的讨论：

1. 中华文化传播史
2. 全球化时代中华文化传播的理念变革
3. 华夏文明与华文传媒：现状和趋势
4. 跨文化传播中的中国文化：挑战与战略
5. 跨文化传播中的中国文化：民族性与多义性
6. 跨文化传播中的华文传媒：挑战与策略
7. 跨文化传播中的华文传媒受众研究
8. 华夏文明与危机公关
9. 全球化背景下的华文传媒：变革、挑战与机会
10. 海外华文媒体传承中华文化的功能
11. 中国对外宣传的变革与效果
12. “北京奥运”后中华文化传播的契机与挑战

二、会议地点
新加坡南洋理工大学黄金辉传播与信息学院

三、会议日程
2009年8月6日 会议代表抵达
2009年8月7至8日 研讨会
2009年8月9日 参观游览

五、注册费
教职人员 新币170元 （或人民币800元）
学 生 新币110元 （或人民币500元）

六、论文提交及录取公布日期
2009年2月1日 论文提交截止（以电邮时间与邮局邮戳为准）
2009年4月1日 公布录取论文名单

七、论文写作要求
1. 论文字数应控制在8000字以内（包括图文及注释），其中，摘要部分约为300字。
2. 论文须以中文或英文撰写。论文发布可以华语或英语进行。
3. 论文应使用word文档格式。
4. 论文应注明作者姓名、工作单位及详细通讯信息。

八、联络信息
请于截止日期前将论文电子版本提交至会议组委会，中国大陆联络方式为：

武汉市 珞喻路1037号 华中科技大学新闻与信息学院 （430074）
杨秀清 老师 舒咏平 老师 李楠 助理
电邮信箱:yxq_yy@163.com ; syp606sina.com ;phoebeleen@hotmail.com
联系电话: 027-87556344 027－62734607 13871140661

九、如有不明事宜，可直接与会议组委会联系，联络方式为：

新加坡南洋理工大学黄金辉传播与信息学院
徐小鸽 助理教授
电话：+65 67906112
电邮：txgxu@ntu.edu.sg


中国新闻史学会
华中科技大学新闻与信息传播学院
新加坡南洋理工大学黄金辉传播与信息学院
二〇〇八年九月十日

二十世纪中国历史中的文化与政治——以五四为场域的反思

国 际 学 术 会 议
International Conference

二十世纪中国历史中的文化与政治
——以五四为场域的反思
Culture and Politics in 20th Century China History:
May 4th as a Site for Rethinking

主办单位：
帕米尔文化艺术研究院
清华大学人文与社会高等研究中心

Organised by
Beijing Pamirs Culture and Art Academy
Tsinghua Institute for Advanced Study in Humanities and Social Sciences


会议地点：北京西苑宾馆
Location: Beijing XiYuan Hotel
时间：2008年10月26日-30日
Conference dates: October 26 – 30 2008

会 议 日 程
Agenda

Opening Ceremony /开幕式


Time :26th Oct. 2008, 14 :00-21 :00/2008年10月26日下午2：00-9：00
Address : Assembly Room on the 5th Floor of National Library of China/中国国家图书馆五楼报告厅
(No.33 Nandajie Zhongguancun,Haidian District, Beijing/北京市海淀区中关村南大街33号)

Procedure/程序：

14：00-14：30：Welcome Speech/致辞
14：30-15：30：Keynote Speech1/主题演讲1
15：30-16：30：Keynote Speech2/主题演讲2
16：30-16：45：Tea Break/茶叙
16：45-18：00：“Pamirs Poem Journey,2008”Poet Recitation/“2008帕米尔诗歌之旅”诗人朗诵
18：00-19：00：Dinner /酒会
19：00-21：00：Film : Twenty-four Cities(directed by Jia Zhangke )/观看贾樟柯电影《二十四城记》

(After the Opening Cermony, the participants will take bus or taxi to return to XiYuan Hotel. The address of XiYuan Hotel is No.1 sanlihe Road, Haidian District, Beijing)


27th Oct.2008/2008年10月27日

开幕式
Opening Speech
9：00-9：10 主持人：汪晖
Host: Prof. Wanghui


27th Oct.2008
9：10-10：50 第一组：重思二十世纪中国
Session I: Rethinking the 20th Century China
主持人：白露（莱斯大学）
Chair: Barlow Tani（Rice University）
包括宣读和讨论。每人宣读不超过25分钟。每组讨论不超过25分钟。
Paper Presentation:within 25 mins. Q & A：within 25 mins.

Presentation 1 题目：作为一套知识型构的二十世纪中国
Title: 20th Century China as a Set of Intellectual Configurations
发言人：Pozzana（意大利博洛尼亚大学）
Speaker: Claudia Pozzana ( Bologna University)

Presentation 2 题目：二十世纪中国的终结：何时？何式？
Title: How and When Did 20th Century China End？
发言人：Russo（博洛尼亚大学）
Speaker: Allessandro Russo（Bologna university）


Presentation 3 题目：去政治化的政治与二十世纪的终结
Title: Depoliticized Politics and the End of 20th Century
发言人：汪晖（清华大学教授）
Speaker: Wanghui(Tsinghua University)

讨论
Q & A

10：50-11：00 茶叙
Tea Break

11：00-12：15 第二组：作为文化转向的五四
Session II : May 4th as a Turn of Culture
主持人：王晓明（上海大学）
Chair: Wang Xiaoming(Shanghai University)
Presentation 1 题目：去政治化的五四运动：一种文化转向
Title：Depolitizing May Fourth: The Cultural Turn.
发言人：Rebecca Karl（纽约大学）
Speaker: Rebecca Karl（New York University）

Presentation 2 题目：边缘处的五四
Title: May Fourth at the Margins
发言人：贺萧（加州圣特克鲁兹分校）
Speaker: Gail Hershatter(UCSC)

12：15-14：30 午餐
Lunch

27th oct.2008
14：30-15：40 讨论
Q & A

第三组：五四内部的知识与政治
Session III : Issues of Knowledge and Politics in May 4th
主持人：Christopher Connery（加州大学圣特克鲁兹分校）
Chair: Christopher Connery（UCSC）

Persentation 1 题目：五四与劳动乌托邦
Ttitle: May 4th and Labor Utopia
发言人：蔡翔（上海大学）
Speaker: CaiXiang（Shanghai University）

Presentation 2 题目：社会的诸因素：五四运动中社会学理论的突变
Title: The Set of Social Factors: the consolidation of theories of sociology in the May 4th event
发言人：白露(莱斯大学)
Speaker: Barlow Tani (Rice University)


Presentation 3 题目：五四新文化言说与优生思想
Title: The new culture of May 4th and aristogenesis thoughts
发言人：坂元弘子（日本一桥大学）
Speaker: Hiroko SAKAMOTO(Hitotsubashi University)


讨论
Q & A

16：10-16：20 茶叙
Tea Break


27th Oct.2008
16：20-17：35 第四组：五四的文化想象与政治
Session IV: The Cultural Imagination and Politics in May 4th
主持人：村田雄二郎（东京大学）
Chair: Murata Yojiro (Tokyo University)

Presentation 1 题目: 二十世纪以来文化的政治变迁：日常生活、流行文化、大众文化
Title: Political Vicissitudes of the Cultiural in the Twentieth Century and Beyond: Everyday Life, Popular Culture, Mass Culture
发言人：Christopher Connery（加州圣特克鲁兹分校）
Speaker: Christopher Connery(UCSC)

Presentation 2 题目：亚洲民族主义和五四
Title：Asian Nationalism and the May Forth: Rethinking the facet of 'cultural' and 'natural' in the May Forth
发言人：白元淡（韩国圣公会大学）
Speaker: PAIK WON DAM（SungKongHoe University）
讨论
Q & A
18:00- 晚宴
Dinner


2008年10月28日
28th Oct.2008
9：00-10：15 第五组：文化变迁的政治学
Session V: The Politics of Cultural Vicissitudes
主持人：王斑（斯坦福大学）
Chair: Wang Ban (Stanford University)
Presentation 1 题目：汉字简化浅论——另一个简体字
Title : On the Simplification of Chinese Characters
发言人：村田雄二郎（东京大学）
Speaker: Murata Yojiro (Tokyo University)

Presentation 2 题目：重思中国散文的简化
Title: Rethinking the Simplification of Modern Chinese Prose
发言人：胡志德（加州大学洛杉矶分校）
Speaker: Theodore Huters (UCLA)
讨论
Q & A

10：15-10：25 茶叙
Tea Break


28th Oct.2008
10：25-12：05 第六组： 五四与鲁迅
Session VI : May 4th and Luxun
主持人：孙歌（中国社科院文学所）
Chair: Sunge （Literature Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences）

Presentation 1 题目：作为政治的现代性抵抗和自我否定的逻辑：竹内好和汪晖的鲁迅研究
Title：Resistance to Modernity and the Logic of Self-Negation as Politics: Takeuchi Yoshimi and Wang Hui on Lu Xun
发言人：慕唯仁（渥太华大学）
Speaker: Viren Murthy （Ottawa University）

Presentation 2 题目：与鲁迅的相遇和竹内好《鲁迅》的形成
Title: Meeting with Luxun and the naissance Takeuchi Yoshimi’s Lxun
发言人：丸川哲史（日本明治大学）
Speaker: Marukawa (Meiji University)


Presentation 3 题目：鲁迅的复仇、反狱之“鬼”与地下的正义
Title: Luxun’s vengeance,the ghost and the justice underneath
发言人：吕新雨（复旦大学）
Speaker: Lu Xinyu ( Fudan University)

讨论
Q & A

12:05-14：00 午餐
Lunch

28th Oct. 2008
14：00-15：40 第七组：五四与中国革命
Session VII : May 4th and China Revolution
主持人：贺萧（加州圣特克鲁兹分校）
Chair: Gail Hershatter(UCSC)

Presentation 1 题目：从教化到启蒙：近代中国政治文化的起源
Title: The origin of Politics Culture of Modern China
发言人：张汝伦（复旦大学）
Speaker: Zhang Rulun ( Fudan University)

Presentation 2 题目：漫谈中国的“社会主义激进文化政治”
Title: Thoughts on the Socialism Radical Cultural Politics in China
发言人：王晓明（上海大学）
Speaker: Wang Xiaoming (Shanghai University)

Presentation 3 题目：战后日本思想史中的“中国革命”
Title：“China Revolution”in Japan Thought History of Postwar Time
发言人：孙歌（中国社科院文学所）
Speaker: Sunge（Literature Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences）
讨论
Q & A

15：40-15：50 茶叙
Tea Break

28th Oct. 2008
15：50-17：30 第八组：后五四时代对五四的重写
Session VIII: The Rewriting of May 4th in Post-May 4th Time
主持人：胡志德（加州大学洛杉矶分校）
Chair: Theodore Huters (UCLA)

Presentation 1 题目：“硬译”与“文化革命”的主体性问题
Title: “Yingyi”and the subjectivity of “cultural revolution”
发言人：程凯（中国社科院文学所）
Speaker: Chengkai (Literature Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)

Presentation 2 题目：五四：不断重临的起点
Title: May 4th: A Beginning
发言人：罗岗（华东师范大学）
Speaker: Luogang (East China Normal University)

Presentation 3 题目：阶级理论与人道主义在中国的兴衰
Title: The vicissitude of class theory and humanitarianism
发言人：赵寻（中央美术学院）
Speaker: Zhaoxun(Central Institute of Art)
讨论
Q & A

17：30-19：40

20：00-22：00 Dinner

电影《二十四城记》研讨会
Workshop on Twenty-four Cities



2008年10月29日
29th Oct. 2008
9：00-10：40 第九组：世纪转折时期的文化
Session IX : Culture at the Turn of the Century
主持人：张汝伦（复旦大学）
Chair: Zhang Rulun ( Fudan University)

Presentation 1 题目：20世纪七、八十年代之交的文化转折
Title: The cultural turn at the transiton from 1970s to 1980s
发言人：戴锦华（北京大学）
Speaker: Dai Jinhua （Peking University）

Presentation 2 题目：地缘政治学、国家发展与第三世界的电影
Title: Geopoitics, National Development, and Third World Cinema
发言人：王斑（斯坦福大学）
Speaker: Ban Wang (Stanford University)

Presentation 3 题目：网络生命政治在中国的浮现
Title: The Emergence of Internet Biopolitics in China
发言人：刘世鼎（澳门大学）
Speaker: Liu Shih-Diing（Macao University）
讨论

10：40-10：50 茶叙
Tea Break

29th Oct. 2008
10：50-12：05 第十场：五四传统的回声
Session X: The Echo of May 4th Tradition
主持人：Pozzana（意大利博洛尼亚大学）
Chair: Claudia Pozzana ( Bologna University)

Presentation 1 题目：当代中国农村的土地集体所有制——一个五四的传统？
Title: The Collective Ownership of Land in the Chinese Countryside Today--- A May 4th Tradition
发言人：崔之元（清华大学）
Speaker: Cui Zhiyuan (Tsinghua University)

Presentation 2 题目：西方中国研究的两个价值话语以及中国的回应
Title: Two discourses in Western China studies and the response of China
发言人：高默波（澳大利亚阿德莱德大学）
Speaker: Chang Fan Gao (Adelaide University)
讨论
Q & A

12：10-14：30 午餐
Lunch

29th Oct. 2008
14：30-17： 第十一场：圆桌讨论
Session XI: Round-table Discussion
主持人：Christopher Connery（加州大学圣特克鲁兹分校）, 汪晖（清华大学）
Chair: Christopher Connery（UCSC） Wanghui (Tsinghua University)

14：30-16：00 圆桌讨论（一）
Round-table Discussion(1)

16：00-16：10 茶点
Tea break

16：10-17-40 圆桌讨论(二)
Round-table Discussion(2)

18:00-

晚宴
Dinner

reading mark on Chinese Cyber Nationalism: Evolution, Characteristics, and Implications(1)

Some arguments I may question:
1. Wu Xu praised Chinese cyber nationalism. For example, he stresses the positive influence of Chinese mainland cyber nationalism on Taiwan Strait crisis during 1995-1996, and the influence of overseas Chiese cyber nationalism on 1996 Atlanta Olympics which ask NBC to apology for their accusation of Chinese athletes cheating in public finally.
2. Again for his absolute positive attitude toward Chinese cyber nationalism, and adopting the public shpere model to analysis this phenomenon, based on the assumption that Chinese cyber nationalism is rational.
3. His technology determinism tendency, which consider Interent changed the old formula of China’s public opinion formation, and it is the Internet which make Chinese nationalism not only a kind of ideology, but also a movement.

However, his argument that the top leaders really do invest substantial time and capital in monitoring activity in cybersphere, and the policy has actually changed as a result of nationalist cyber activity, is a solid base and start point for my study.

email

I understand, Tiffiny --Try your best before the 18th then. You have to do this with confidence because, otherwise, the real world of academia will be too formidable a challenge for you!
......

reading mark on Banal Nationalism (2)

    Billig considers nationalism as a kind of ideology, and so discovers the 'banal' characteristics of nationalism in established Western countries.
    I agree with him in the sense that nationalism is not disappear in an established state. Actually we live in the wolrd of nation-states, and so nationalism will also spread throughout the world.
    Nevertheless, contemporary sociologists are seldom treat nationalism as a pervasive phenomenon. When they speak of the 'society' , they no longer have in mind a 'bourgeois society' or a 'human society' beyond the state, but increasingly the somewhat diluted ideal image of a nation-state (Elias, 1978: 241), however, they always consider nationalism as a special subject which is dangerously irrational, surplus and alien.
    In my thesis, I'll try to consider nationalism as a pervasive phenomenon. Of course, it may have different kinds, but it is pervasive through the world's nation-states. Under this assumption, to study the relationship between Chinese nationalism and Chinese modernization (I'll specify this later).
    In addition, to see nationalism as ideological constructions and stress its 'banal' characteristics is to stress the agent aspect of the hegemony, and so omit the structure aspect. Under the critical realism model, I hope to study both of the agency and structure aspects of hegemony process for Chinese nationalism.

A little nervous

    Time flies quickly. I must know what is the most important thing for me up to now; must concentrate on what I am doing; and must have confidence on myself. 

搭架子

email with Guiquan, 提到他在读的Miachael Mann的《社会权力的来源》
突然想到，用政治、经济、意识形态、军事四种权力来源来分析中国社会的social structure，阐释structure hegemony的变迁，以及基于这样的structure，agents不同的hegemony strategy，的确是个思路。

可我该想想怎样把韦伯取向的分析视角纳入到critical realism中来？

reading mark on Banal Nationalism (1)

Studying nationalism as an Ideology
    In his book Banal Nationalism, Billig states that in general, Western academics today find it easier to recognize nationalism in ‘others’ than in themselves. Nationalism can be seen almost everywhere but ‘here’. And in Western, in the absence of an overt political challenge, this ideology might appear banal, routine, almost invisible (p15).
    Therefore, he criticizes many Western social scientists ignore the banal characteristics of nationalism and their projecting theories of nationalism. These approaches tend to define nationalism in a restricted way, as an extreme/surplus phenomenon. For such social scientists, nationalism is equated with the outlook of nationalist movements and, when there are no such movements, nationalism is not seen to be an issue (p16).
    Nevertheless, this is not the situation in China. Chinese nationalism is much more visible and sensitive than Western countries based on Billig’s statement. We can see it everywhere, although its performances are variety. And Chinese people always define their sentiment as nationalism or patriotism. Actually, they indeed equal nationalism with patriotism.
    Can Chinese nationalism be called ‘banal nationalism’? Broadly speaking, I think nationalism in each country has the banal characteristics if nationalism is broadened as a concept to cover the ways that established nation-states are routinely reproduced. And people in each country are familiar with the “unwaved flag”.     However, Chinese nationalism is more manifest, overt, articulated and often fiercely expressed. I am wonder whether we can call Chinese nationalism as “manifest nationalism”?
    Since Chinese nationalism is much more manifest, in contrast to the Western situation, Chinese social scientists always pay much more attention on their own nationalism, not others.

    Billig also criticizes the naturalizing theories of nationalism. It tends to depict contemporary loyalties as ‘needs for identity’, ‘attachments to society’ or ‘primordial ties’, which are theoretically posited to be universal psychological states, and not peculiar to the age of nation-states (p17).
    To see nationalism as an ideology, Billig argues that “An infinite variety of psychological acts is required for the reproduction of nation-states. These psychological acts should not be analyzed purely in terms of the motives of the individual actors. An ideological analysis of psychological states stresses that the acts, and, indeed, the motives of the individuals, are constituted through socio-historical processes, rather than vice versa.” (p17)
    I agree with Billig in this part. Just as Gellner has argued, nationalism belongs to the era of nation-states. There can be no nationalism without nation-states; and thus, nationalism is a historically specific form of consciousness.
    However, whether or not nationalism is an ideology is a big question to the nationalism theorists. Many scholars regard nationalism as a kind of ideology taken-for-granted, and one of the paradigms to study nationalism is the ideological versions, such as Elie Kedourie, and more recently Bruce Kapferer and Mark Juergensmeyer, who tend to see nationalism as a belief system, a form of religion surrogate or secular religion, and to link its emergence and power to changes in the sphere of ideas and beliefs.
    On the other hand, the intellectual critique to such idea is also serious. Anderson (1983) considered the concept of nationalism as philosophical poverty and even incoherence. And it is echoed by Freeden, who argues that nationalism fails to meet the criteria of a comprehensive theory; instead, at best, it may be a distinct thin-centred ideology or a component of other, already existing ideologies, such as liberalism, conservative, socialism, and even fascism (Freeden, 1998).
    Nomatter whether nationalism is a kind of ideology or not, it is true that Chinese government never consider nationalism as its own official ideology. What they talk about is patriotism, or loving the Chinese nation, instead of promoting so-called nationalism. However, the Chinese government does have its official nationalism, and always try to guide the populace nationalism sentiments according to its willing directions. Their hegemonic strategies are always latent, and are seems natural to its people.
    So can we describe Chinese nationalism as: manifest nationalism, latent hegemony?